{Previously Published in The Jerusalem Post}
Another misused word directed at Israel is the charge of apartheid. Anyone opening up a real dictionary would see that the true meaning of the word has nothing to do with anything in Israel.
A year ago I didn’t know that “it’s all about
the Benjamins” was an antisemitic slur. I could never have predicted that a
self-identified group of “Justice Democrats” who would call themselves “the
Squad,” would become a virtual seminar in antisemitic rhetoric, and the voice
of an intolerant intersectional movement that disparages anyone who crosses
them as a racist, Islamophobic or a bigot.
The appropriation and distortion of words like concentration camps, apartheid,
Nazi and martyr is bad enough coming from the Squad, but over the last year,
the words have been weaponized and have become part of mainstream discourse,
exemplified by the antisemite UK Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, some mainstream
media outlets, Palestinian leadership and on college campuses where it
flourishes in academia and in “social justice” movements.
Words are mightier than the sword, and in the
history of Jew hatred, they have led to Inquisitions, Crusades, pogroms,
discrimination, delegitimization, expulsions and the Holocaust.
This has been a big year for the misappropriation of the word martyr, whose
meaning was twisted by PA President Mahmoud Abbas after the US Congress
withdrew American taxpayer funds under the Taylor Force Law for those we call
terrorists in a “Pay to Slay” scheme, but are called glorious martyrs by the
Palestinian Authority. This month, Abbas said “We reject [the] designation of
our martyrs as terrorists… they are ‘the most sacred thing we have.’” In what
sick universe are suicide bombers, kidnappers and killers of children martyrs?
One member of the Squad opened their Orwellian vocabulary to misappropriate the
word massacre to describe Israeli soldiers killing terrorists who were
targeting Israeli civilians along the Gaza border, as a “massacre of
protesters.”
Another misused word directed at Israel is the charge of apartheid. Anyone
opening up a real dictionary would see that the true meaning of the word has
nothing to do with anything in Israel, but since the term is so heinous, it has
been appropriated as a tool to delegitimize Israel’s right to exist.
This year has been a big year for the term “dual loyalty.” Minnesota Justice
Democrat Ilhan Omar charged Jewish legislators with dual loyalty, by “hav[ing]
allegiance… to a foreign country [Israel].”
Democratic chairwoman of the House Appropriations Committee Nita Lowey, who
will be challenged by a Justice Democrat next year, confronted Omar’s
antisemitic smear, reminding her “throughout history, Jews have been accused of
dual loyalty, leading to discrimination and violence.”
US President Donald Trump also inappropriately used words evoking dual loyalty
this summer, when he charged Jews who vote Democrat as being disloyal to
Israel. As a supporter of Israel, he should have been more sensitive to those
dangerous words with a history of too many antisemitic associations.
However, the most egregious abuse of words this summer was by the Squad’s
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Justice Democrat from New York, who shamelessly
appropriated the words “never again” and “concentration camps” to advance her
agenda against American immigration policy.
“The United States is running concentration camps on our southern border and
that is exactly what they are,” said AOC.
When AOC uses the words “concentration camps” to describe border detention
facilities, you have to be tone deaf or a Holocaust denying revisionist
historian not to understand that to almost every person in the United States
since the end of World War Two, the words “concentration camp” are identified
with the Holocaust and genocidal death camps. Her goal was not to have a legitimate
policy debate, but to demonize opponents with incendiary language.
Whatever one thinks about the conditions of detention facilities for illegal
aliens and their children, it is a travesty to liken them to the Nazi
concentration camps where people were used as slave labor, starved, beaten,
raped, dehumanized and degraded – both Jews and other persecuted minorities –
led like sheep to slaughter in an organized mass extermination. She and those
who defend her use of the term concentration camps in this context insult the
memory of those who were rounded up, deliberately treated as vermin and
massacred in the Holocaust.
SOMETIMES, THE most dangerous words are the ones that are left out, distorting
the context of a story. CAMERA reported that The New York Times and The
Washington Post choose to inaccurately describe the organization that sponsored
Omar and Tlaib’s trip to the disputed territories. The organization Miftah has
a long history of antisemitic associations, but a Times editorial referred to it
as “a Palestinian organization… that promotes ‘global awareness and knowledge
of Palestinian realities.’” The Washington Post said Miftah is “headed by
Palestinian lawmaker and longtime peace negotiator Hanan Ashrawi.”
So how could anybody take issue with a nonprofit run by a peacemaker,
sponsoring a fact-finding trip to the Middle East?
New York Times columnist Bari Weiss wrote other words that the
Times editorial board and The Washington Post refused to
include, that Miftah is “an organization that has proudly praised female
suicide bombers, and pushed the medieval blood libel,” which is alive and well
in Ms. Tlaib’s Palestinian Arab society.
Even the term antisemitism is selectively used. For the Squad and its ilk,
antisemitism is the realm of the Right. No one can deny that Jew hatred from
the Right has a long history, and its contemporary white supremacist followers
have committed despicable hate filled violence to this day.
However, the words that are left out, a form of political revisionism, is that
on today’s college campus, antisemitism comes primarily from the Left. In
Europe, according to a recent survey by the European Union’s Agency for
Fundamental Rights, Muslim and left-wing antisemitism was more prevalent
especially against young European Jews.
Words matter.
With three months before the 2020 presidential year, we already have had more
than our share of trivializing the Holocaust, weaponized words and
mainstreaming of antisemitism through a media that is so fearful of not being
politically correct that it seems to have lost its moral compass.
Let’s hold our presidential candidates, politicians, clergy, media and even our
friends accountable for what they say and write.
The writer is the director of MEPIN, the Middle East Political Information
Network. He regularly briefs members of the Senate, House and their foreign
policy advisors. He is a columnist for The Jerusalem Post, and a contributor to
i24TV, The Hill, JTA and The Forward.